Legal Opinion

Carpentier v. Lainson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 26, 1957No. 49200PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarson, J.

Due process of law under both Federal and State Constitutions requires that one charged with a crime receive a fair trial. The right to advice and aid of counsel in serious offenses, especially in capital offenses, is recognized in most jurisdictions including Iowa. By most authorities this representation or advice of counsel may be waived if done so intentionally and competently. The sole question involved in this case is whether, under the related circumstances, a youth of seventeen years may do so. The trial court thought he could not, but we disagree.

The facts are not in dispute.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. DicksHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Scalf v. BennettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. State v. GilbertNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API