Penny v. Fellner
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Noble County; before A. G. C. Bierer, District Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Keaton, J.:
As shown by the record herein, the question of the correctness of the judgment of the trial court depends entirely upon the interpretation to be given a certain lease attached to plaintiff’s amended bill of particulars as “exhibit A,” as construed in the light of the oral testimony adduced upon the trial. The amended bill of particulars, omitting the formal parts thereof, is in the following language:
“The plaintiff states for his cause of action that the defendant herein, Samuel Fellner, is justly indebted to him in the sum of $91.04, the same being for rents…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dunnington v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
- National Bank of Guthrie v. EarlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Thompson v. FieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by21 opinions
- De Vitt v. City of El RenoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Hockaday v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Poff v. LockridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Ferguson v. Union Nat. Bank of Columbus, OhioSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Pinson & Sunday v. PrentiseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.