Legal Opinion

Hays v. Coy

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 29, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULLEN, Commissioner.

Upon a former appeal of this case it was held that J. Smith Hays, Sr., and his son were not entitled to serve as coadministra-tors with the will annexed of the estate of Mr. Hays’ deceased wife. Cosby v. Hays, Ky., 257 S.W.2d 575.

Upon remand of the case, the heirs and devisees of Mrs. Hays, other than her surviving husband, nominated C. C. Coy, a brother of the deceased, as administrator with the will annexed. The county court refused to appoint Mr. Coy, and instead appointed the Winchester Bank. Upon appeal to the circuit court the order of the county court was reversed,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rieke's Administrator v. RiekeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Barnett's Adm'r v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  3. Liberty Bank & Trust Co. v. Kentucky Title Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Cosby v. HaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
  5. Mullins v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Skaggs v. CookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
  2. Coy v. HaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955
  3. Yeary v. YearyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API