Legal Opinion

Goodall v. Monson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2017No. 20160235PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEvers, Justice.

[¶ 1] Charles W.H. Monson, LeeAnn Tarter, and KayCee Williams (“the Mon-sons”) appeal a district court judgment reforming a deed executed in 1980 and quieting title in favor of Steve P. Goodall, Robert L. Goodall, Anne M. Stout, Joanne M. Quale, and Darrel Quale (“the Goo-dalls”). We conclude the district court did not err in admitting extrinsic evidence to support the Goodalls’ argument that a mutual mistake had been made, and the district court’s findings supporting reformation of the deed are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] This case involves the sale of mineral…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Ell v. EllNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Johnson v. HovlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Johnson v. HovlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Heart River Partners v. GoetzfriedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Blasi v. Bruin E&P PartnersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. v. EOG Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  4. Dixon v. DixonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. In re Racing Servs., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API