Legal Opinion

Vaught v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 2007No. D050358PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCONNELL, P. J.

We hold the workers’ compensation exclusivity rule of Labor Code 1 section 3602 bars the civil action of plaintiffs Marck O. Vaught (Marck) and Maria Vaught (Maria) (together the Vaughts) against March’s employer, the State of California (State), for injuries he sustained while residing on state premises. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Since 1981, Marck has worked as a park ranger for the State, through the Department of Parks and Recreation (Department). In 2004, Marck accepted a new position as resource ranger in the State’s…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Rubenstein v. RubensteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Arriaga v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. O'Rourke v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Wright v. St. of CACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Albert v. Satellite Management Co. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API