Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Liquidation of National Surety Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 10, 1941No. Claim No. Misc. No. 78; Claim No. Misc. No. 79; Claim No. Misc. No. 80; Claim No. Misc. No. 1085Published

1DissentUntermyer, J.

The order should be reversed and the claims allowed upon the ground that the sureties on the general bond given to the Inter-borough Rapid Transit Company became subrogated to all the rights of the Inter-borough upon payment of its claim against D. C. Serber, Inc., and were entitled to enforce those rights against the National Surety Company under its bonds subsequently given in the mechanic’s" lien action. (Katz v. Mendelsohn, 260 N. Y. 434.) It does not answer this contention to say that the claim of the Interborough was paid by the appellants, so that the mechanic’s lien action could no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Hooker Electrochemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Katz v. MendelsohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API