City of Pittsburgh v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1ConcurrenceMontemuro, Justice
I concur in the result reached by the Majority, but write to emphasize my belief that our decision carves out a narrow exception to the general rule that pensions are mandatory subjects of bargaining under the Public Employee Relations Act (PERA).1 \
Today we are confronted with reconciling two conflicting statutes, section 701 of PERA and section 607 of the Municipal Pension Plan Funding Standard and Recovery Act (Act 205)2, both of which affect collective bargaining over public employee pension benefits. Section 701 of PERA imposes an obligation to bargain in good faith over “wages, hours,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. State College Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- City of Philadelphia v. District Council 33Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Joint Bargaining Committee of the Pennsylvania Social Services Union v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.