Hagely v. Hagely
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Napa County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
— This is an action of ejectment, to recover land situate in the county of Napa. Plaintiff had judgment, from which, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.
The amended answer of defendant sets up several separate defenses. A demurrer was interposed thereto by plaintiff, which was sustained by the court to the second cause of defense in such answer, and the ruling is assigned as error.
The portion of the answer at which the demurrer was aimed, and to which it was sustained, averred that plaintiff’s cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations, to wit, by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Maynard v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by8 opinions
- Webber v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Crane v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Nicholson v. TarpeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Loveland v. GarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Snow v. RichUtah Supreme Court · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.