Bernard Smith and Patrick B. Smith v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs Patrick B. Smith and Bernard Smith appeal from a judgment entered in the District Court for the District of Minnesota * dismissing their action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For reversal plaintiffs argue the district court erred in determining plaintiffs’ claim to be a tort claim and thus barred by the applicable statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b).
For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
Plaintiffs’ action is based upon Minnesota’s Civil Damage Act, Minn.Stat.Ann. § 340.95 (West 1972) (amended 1977), 1 a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mary Eileen Meeker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Clare Dodge Childers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Mark Pittman, a Minor, by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem Milan L. Pittman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Gerald D. Peterson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Mayes v. ByersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Leonhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Leonhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Harden v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Bruce W. Robbins v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Robert Vernon Bruce v. United States of America, the General Services Administration and Ralph W. McCannCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.