Legal Opinion

Bernard Smith and Patrick B. Smith v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 20, 1978No. 78-1488PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs Patrick B. Smith and Bernard Smith appeal from a judgment entered in the District Court for the District of Minnesota * dismissing their action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For reversal plaintiffs argue the district court erred in determining plaintiffs’ claim to be a tort claim and thus barred by the applicable statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b).

For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

Plaintiffs’ action is based upon Minnesota’s Civil Damage Act, Minn.Stat.Ann. § 340.95 (West 1972) (amended 1977), 1 a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mary Eileen Meeker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  2. Clare Dodge Childers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Mark Pittman, a Minor, by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem Milan L. Pittman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. Gerald D. Peterson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  5. Mayes v. ByersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Leonhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Leonhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Harden v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  4. Bruce W. Robbins v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  5. Robert Vernon Bruce v. United States of America, the General Services Administration and Ralph W. McCannCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API