Legal Opinion

Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 19, 2000No. CIV.A. 97-2711 SSHPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

Before the Court are defendants’ motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs’ opposition, defendants’ reply thereto, and various supplemental memoranda submitted by defendants. Upon consideration of the parties’ submissions and thé entire record in this case, the Court grants defendants’ motion. Although findings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary on decisions of motions under Rule 12 or 56, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a); Summers v. Department of Justice, 140 F.3d 1077, 1079-80 (D.C.Cir.1998), the Court nonetheless sets forth its reasoning.

BACKGROUND

Th…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Hobson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  5. Summers v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. News World Communications, Inc. v. ThompsenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Johnson v. LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2001-4District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  3. Kubicki ex rel. Kubicki v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Kubicki v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  5. Levi v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API