Legal Opinion

In re Genins

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 28, 1994No. S94Y0317PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The State Bar brought a formal complaint against R. John Genins alleging that he violated Standards 4, 31, 45, 61, 63, 65 and 68 of the Rules and Regulations of the State Bar of Georgia. The special master found and the State Disciplinary Board Review Panel accepted the finding that in 1979 Genins was retáined on a one-third contingency fee basis for the collection of debts owed to the client. In 1986, he obtained a judgment on behalf of the client and in late 1989 he collected by garnishment $7,230.80 which he deposited in his personal bank account. Soon thereafter, and without informing the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Christopher A. Burger, Cross-Appellant v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent- Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Christopher A. Burger, Cross-Appellant v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent- Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Christopher A. Burger, Cross-Appellant v. Walter A. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Christopher A. Burger, Cross-Appellant v. Walter A. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  5. In Re CRWSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API