Christopher A. Burger, Cross-Appellant v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent- Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1DissentJohnson, Circuit Judge
I dissent from the majority’s adoption of the district court order denying Burger’s claim that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel. A review of the record reveals that Burger was denied the effective assistance of counsel by both his appointed counsel’s active representation of his co-indictee’s conflicting interest and his counsel’s failure to present any evidence on his behalf at either of his two sentencing proceedings.
The general principles applicable to ineffective assistance of counsel claims were articulated in Strickland v. Washington, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Richard Zuck v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Ivon Ray Stanley v. Walter D. Zant, Warden Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.