Housand v. Armour & Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of. the Court was delivered by
Mr. W. C. Coti-iran, Acting Associate Justice;.
The defendant, as named, Armour & Co., is a corporation of the State of Maine, has no agents in this State, and has not complied with the requirements of the law relative to the domestication of foreign corporations. The defendants, W. G. Moore and J. Austin Powell, are residents of Horry County. It appears that Moore is the owner of the store of which Powell is the manager. It developed in the trial that there was another corporation known as Armour & Co., which is a corporation of the State of Illinois,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burkhardt v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Stack v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
- Robertson v. Ætna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Edwards v. ColemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Williams v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
3Cited by5 opinions
- Charles v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. EisemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Boylston v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Hollis v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Cooper v. Anheuser Busch, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1941