Legal Opinion
Boylston v. Armour & Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided December 23, 1940No. 15171PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Associate Justice Stukes.
Respondent was awarded a verdict in the sum of Eighteen Hundred Dollars actual damages, the trial Judge having instructed against punitive damages, by a jury in the Rich-land County Court against Armour & Company, a corporation of Illinois, and from the judgment entered thereon this appeal was taken.
In the complaint it was alleged that respondent on March 17, 1937, partook in the Dixie Cafe in the town of Black-ville, South Carolina, of a serving of ham which turned out to have been labeled “Armour Star Ham,” in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kniess v. Armour & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
- Delk v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
- Hopkins v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Housand v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
- Sanders v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Eickhoff v. Beard-Laney, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Trivelas v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Turner v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
- Shields Ex Rel. Estate of Shields v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
- Orr v. SaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.