Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Rost
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 10, 1925No. 24,076PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to set aside a deed made by the plaintiff. The blank space for the name of the grantee was not filled when signed by the plaintiff. Afterwards the name James Rost, Trustee, was inserted. The land conveyed was described as one acre extending into a lake, in a named lot, section, township and range, “more particularly described as follows;” but it was not described further when the plaintiff signed the deed. Afterwards a metes and bounds description was added. There was judgment for the defendants and the plaintiff appeals.
1. The rule in this state is that, if a deed is delivered with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. KorrerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Board of Education v. HughesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Southern Pine Lumber Co. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Boyd Lumber Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Mehus v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Engelking v. First State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Thompson v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.