National Labor Relations Board v. Mt. Vernon Telephone Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1DissentCelebrezze, Circuit Judge
(dissenting) :
With the utmost respect, I must dissent from the majority opinion.
The Respondent knew of Sanford’s Union activities. Management had a list of Union men, and also a list of the nominees for Union office. There was conflicting evidence of Union hostility. It is alleged that President Quatman told employee Blubaugh that “within a year’s time he would be rid of the Union and everybody else that had anything to do with it”. District Manager Tanner, in a letter dated November 29, 1962, recommended a “good company man” over another because the other employee had a brother at Mt. Vernon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Elias Brothers Big Boy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. The Bendix Corporation (Research Laboratories Division)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pyne Molding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- National Labor Relations Board v. Interurban Gas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.