Legal Opinion · Dissent

National Labor Relations Board v. Mt. Vernon Telephone Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 2, 1965No. 16236_1Published

1DissentCelebrezze, Circuit Judge

(dissenting) :

With the utmost respect, I must dissent from the majority opinion.

The Respondent knew of Sanford’s Union activities. Management had a list of Union men, and also a list of the nominees for Union office. There was conflicting evidence of Union hostility. It is alleged that President Quatman told employee Blubaugh that “within a year’s time he would be rid of the Union and everybody else that had anything to do with it”. District Manager Tanner, in a letter dated November 29, 1962, recommended a “good company man” over another because the other employee had a brother at Mt. Vernon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Elias Brothers Big Boy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. The Bendix Corporation (Research Laboratories Division)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Pyne Molding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Interurban Gas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API