Legal Opinion

Florida Houndsmen Ass'n v. State, Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 6, 2012No. 1D11-3190PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

2Per curiam

We previously affirmed the order appealed from in this case and now write to address Appellee’s, The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), motion for attorney’s fees under section 57.105(1), Florida Statutes (2010), and the motion of Robert Augustus Harper III to withdraw as counsel for Appellants. For the reasons explained below, FWC’s motion is granted to the extent it requests fees under section 57.105(l)(b) only, and Mr. Harper Ill’s motion to withdraw as counsel is denied.

This appeal arose from a final…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Visoly v. Security Pacific Credit Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Waddington v. Baptist Medical Center of Beaches, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Paul v. AvrahamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. HARVEY LEE DAVIS and ERIC MCCABE v. KENNETH I. BAILYNSONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. Briarwood Capital v. Lennar Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. In the Interest of A.T.H.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  5. Nordt v. NordtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API