Legal Opinion
In the Interest of A.T.H.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 14, 2015No. 1D14-3370PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
2Per curiam
Upon our own initiative pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.410(a), we sanction attorney Steven R. Andrews for filing a frivolous appeal, as proscribed by section 57.105(1), Florida Statutes (2014), and for failing to timely respond to an order of this court.
The instant matter arises from a decade-long domestic and child custody dispute between Reschin Moore and Mark Hash regarding their son, A.T.H. In November 2012, Moore and Hash entered into a marriage dissolution settlement agreement, a portion of which contained a reconciliation plan for A.T.H. and…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Boca Burger, Inc. v. ForumSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Visoly v. Security Pacific Credit Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Wendy's of NE Florida, Inc. v. VandergriffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Bortz v. BortzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Waddington v. Baptist Medical Center of Beaches, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- THE DENTAL LAW FIRM, P.A. d/b/a SHOCHET LAW GROUP v. PAUL KINCER, SCOTT MOORE, and THE PEOPLE'S CHOICE PUBLIC ADJUSTERS, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022