Legal Opinion

Owino v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 4, 2009No. 06-74297PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Sylvester Owino petitions for review of the BIA’s final order of removal, which found him credible but denied his requests for asylum, withholding of removal and deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). He appeals only his CAT deferral claim. Owino argues that (1) the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) and Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) applied the wrong legal standard to his CAT claim; (2) the IJ violated his due process rights by failing to allow his brother to testify telephonieally; and (3) the BIA violated his due process rights by failing to consider…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Karapetyan v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Lemus-Galvan v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Daniel Agonafer v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Edu v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Sylvester Owino v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Stephen Fon v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  5. ZHANLING JIANG v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API