Legal Opinion

Providence Jewelry Co. v. Nagel

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1910No. L.A. No. 2448PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The district court of appeal for the second district having failed to agree on a decision in this case it was certified to this court for determination. The following opinion written by Justice Allen of that court and concurred in by Justice Taggart, is approved and adopted as the opinion of this court:—

“Appeal by plaintiff upon a bill of exceptions from a judgment rendered in favor of defendant.
“The action was one for the price and value of merchandise of the market value of $379.30 alleged to have been sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant. The answer denies the sale or the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. L.A. & Redondo R.R. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Maxson v. LlewelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buffalo Arms, Inc. v. Remler Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Ellis v. Union Trust CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Campion v. DowneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API