Legal Opinion
Browder v. Derwinski
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided April 5, 1991No. 90-44PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANKIN, Associate Judge:
Appellant, George A. Browder, seeks service connection for aggravation of a preexisting right eye injury under 38 U.S.C. §§ 310 and 353 (1988) and 38 C.F.R. § 3.306 (1990). We remand due to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals’ (BVA) failure to comply with the requirements of 38 U.S.C. § 4004(d)(1) (1988) and its failure to apply and discuss 38 U.S.C. § 353 (1988) and 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.303(c) and 3.306 (1990).
Jurisdiction is founded upon 38 U.S.C.- § 4052 (1988).
The BVA is required to apply all relevant statutes and regulations appropriate to the particular case before it. See…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Tucker v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
- Simon v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Moore v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Hensley v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
- Browder v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.