Federal Storage & Van Co. v. Davis

Plaintiff in error contends:(1) The court erred in allowing Mrs. Davis, the wife of the plaintiff, to testify to matters outside of the scope of the agency as proved in the trial of the case.(2) There was no competent evidence as to ■ the value of the furniture or of defendant’s negligence.(3) The verdict was not supported l)y the evidence.(4) The court erred in allowing Mrs. Davis to testify as to what was paid for the furniture in 1927, for the reason that too much time had elapsed between that date of purchase and the trial(5) An alleged quotient verdict is the basis of this contended…