McFall v. Buckeye Grangers' Warehouse Ass'n
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior. Court of Yolo County and from an order denying a new trial. W. H. Grant, Judge, The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, C.
McFall, the plaintiff in this action, was the purchaser at a sale under execution of fourteen shares of stock in the Buckeye Grangers’ Warehouse Association, a corporation, one of the defendants here; the ultimate question on appeal is whether property in the stock passed by virtue of such sale; the court below held that it did. One Schautz owned the stock originally, and held certificates therefor issued by said Warehouse Association; Schautz was sued in a justice’s court by the Bank of Winters, a corporation, on a promissory note wherein he promised to pay a specified sum of money…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hibberd v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Spreckels v. Nevada BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Lehnhardt v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Montgomery v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sheehan v. All Persons, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Sherlock v. VinsonMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Weldon v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Loveridge v. Buehler, Circuit Court of the 18th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Brevard County1957