Legal Opinion

People v. Nunes

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1920No. Crim. No. 496PublishedCited by 21 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County and from an order denying a new trial. Malcolm C. Glenn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

Defendant was informed against by the district attorney of the county of Sacramento for the crime of mayhem. Upon a trial he was found guilty and he prosecutes this appeal from the judgment of conviction and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Louis Dulmaine, the prosecuting witness, was engaged as a bartender in a building at the corner of Seventh and L Streets, in the city of Sacramento, his hours of duty being from 5 o’clock P. M., until closing time the next morning. He was so engaged on the night of June 29, 1919, closed his saloon at 2 o’clock on the morning of June 30th,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Terrell v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. SearsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. V.V.California Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. McKelvyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. People v. SekonaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. United States v. Earl CookCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API