Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Kirven
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Gage, J., Darlington, February, 1901. Proceeding under agricultural lien by Virginia-Carolina Chemical Company against J. P. Kirven. Verdict for defendant. From order refusing new trial, plaintiff appeals. Messrs.
Read the full summary
Before Gage, J., Darlington, February, 1901. Proceeding under agricultural lien by Virginia-Carolina Chemical Company against J. P. Kirven. Verdict for defendant. From order refusing new trial, plaintiff appeals. Messrs. Willcox & Willcox cite: This Court zvill reviezv errors of lazv in refusing new trials: 36 S. C., 586. Judge shozild set aside a verdict if there be no evidence to support it: 57 S. C., 289; 23 S. C., 231; 49 , S. C., 454; 52 S. C., 371; 54 S. C., 599; 58 S. C., 215. Respondent’s additional grounds cannot be sustained: 59 S. C., 508; 23 S. C., 105; 16 S. C., 1. Messrs. Woods…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
The appeal herein is from an order refusing a motion for a new trial. The issues are thus stated in the record: “This appeal is in a special proceeding arising under the provisions of section 2517 of the Revised Statutes. A warrant to seize crop was issued by the clerk of the Court for Darlington'County, under an affidavit in which it was claimed that the amount due under the agricultural lien was $2,298, with interest thereon at seven per cent, from the 25th day of October, 1898, and 85 cents protest fees. Under this warrant, crops of…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Lorick & Lowrance, Inc. v. Julius H. Walker & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Leesville Mfg. Co. v. Morgan Wood & Iron WorksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906