Legal Opinion

United States v. Estate of Marston G. Slate, Deceased

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1970No. 28814_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.

The opinion of the District Court in this case is published at 304 F.Supp. 380 (1969).

From 1952 to 1963, inclusive, Dr. Marston G. Slate filed no federal income tax returns. On September 12, 1964, he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. James Leo Huth v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Estate of SlateDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frances Duchek and Arthur Duchek v. Rudolph Jacobi and Elfi JacobiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Tercero v. TX Southmost Coll DistCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. AugspurgerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API