Legal Opinion

Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Hudson Auto Supply Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 20, 1931No. 316Published

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

In the above suit the defendants were held to infringe United States letters patent No. 1,460,095, and on August 8, 1929, an interlocutory decree was granted enjoining them from infringing the patent. No appeal was taken by the defendants from this interlocutory decree, but on August 14, 1930, over one year after its entry and after the accounting before the master had been proceeding for some time, they gave notice of a motion for a rehearing, because of newly discovered prior patents and misapprehension as to defendants’ rights. The only reason given for such…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McMicken v. PerinSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. American Grain Separator Co. v. Twin City Separator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  3. Roemer v. NeumannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Monroe Body Co. v. HerzogCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
  5. Baker v. Walter Baker & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API