Stumpf v. Stumpf
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
This Court in Wood v. Wood, 227 Md. 211, 216, recently repeated what prior cases had said from time to time in regard to a separation of spouses—“acquiescence to or assent to what one cannot prevent does not amount to a voluntary agreement thereto.” See, for example, Rhoderick v. Rhoderick, 224 Md. 478, 481; Moran v. Moran, 219 Md. 399, 404; Courtney v. Courtney, 213 Md. 600, 602; Miller v. Miller, 178 Md. 12, 21. On the other hand where the husband demanded in anger that the wife leave and she did not refuse,, but agreed and did leave, it was held in Matysek v. Matysek, 212 Md. 44, that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moran v. MoranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Matysek v. MatysekCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
- Wood v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Courtney v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of Estate of LorenzoHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- Wallace v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Sullivan v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Rhoad v. RhoadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Spencer v. SpencerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.