Legal Opinion

Lane v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1989No. 55376PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY M. GAERTNER, Judge.

Defendant/movant/appellant, Steven Lane, appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Defendant relies on two points on appeal. First, defendant asserts that the motion court clearly erred by refusing to find ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Secondly, defendant asserts that the motion court erred in denying his double jeopardy claim as to his conviction and sentence for felony murder. We affirm in part and modify in part.

The record reveals that defendant, Lane, was convicted by a jury in 1977 of attempted robbery by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  4. Jones v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. TwenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. State v. RoeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Whited v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Todd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1995
  5. State v. McRobertsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API