Goldingay v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
Michael H. Simon, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Roger Goldingay ("Goldingay") and Carol Otis ("Otis") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") are husband and wife. They each filed their own lawsuit in state court against Defendants Progressive Casualty Insurance Company ("Progressive") and Chevron U.S.A Inc. ("Chevron") (collectively, "Defendants"). Based on substantially identical factual allegations, Goldingay and Otis assert substantially identical legal claims based exclusively on state law. Defendants timely removed the two lawsuits to federal court, and the Court has consolidated these actions.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crescent Mine, LLC v. Bunker Hill Mining Corporation; and Placer Mining Corporation (d/b/a New Bunker Hill Mining Co.)District Court, D. Idaho · 2026
- Jurj v. AndersenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
- Michael G. Peterson v. Multnomah County Sheriff’s Department, “Jail Division,”District Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Michael Pearson, James Suter, Silvia Suter, and Julia Strange, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Port of Morrow; Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc; Madison Ranches, Inc; Threemile Canyon Farms, LLC; and Beef Northwest Feeders, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025