Legal Opinion

Morgan v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided August 8, 1997No. A-6200PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Clarence Morgan appeals his conviction for third-degree misconduct involving weapons, AS 11.61.200(a). Morgan was convicted under subsection (a)(10) of the statute, which prohibits a convicted felon from residing in a dwelling when the felon knows that there is a concealable firearm in the dwelling, unless a court or the head of the local law enforcement agency has given the felon written permission to live there. 1

Morgan argues (under two different legal theories) that subsection (a)(10) can not be enforced against a person who was unaware of the statute’s existence at the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McClain v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Speidel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Hentzner v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Gibson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997
  5. Haggren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. RineerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  2. Stevens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
  3. Stoner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2018
  4. Richard A. Kinmon v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
  5. Stoner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API