Legal Opinion

Haggren v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided May 11, 1992No. A-3908PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

J. Michael Haggren was convicted of the strict liability violation of operating a com mercial drift gill net within 600 feet of a set gill net. 5 AAC 21.335(a). Haggren now appeals both his conviction and his sentence. We affirm.

According to the written findings entered by Superior Court Judge Charles K. Cran-ston, Haggren was fishing with a drift net approximately 250 feet offshore from a shore fishery lease issued by the City of Kenai to Frank Canady. As Haggren was fishing, Canady placed a set net in the water and began to fish. Believing that the two nets were so…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ostrosky v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
  3. Clucas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Allen v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
  2. Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002
  3. State v. DeCastroHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997
  5. Maguire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API