Haggren v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
J. Michael Haggren was convicted of the strict liability violation of operating a com mercial drift gill net within 600 feet of a set gill net. 5 AAC 21.335(a). Haggren now appeals both his conviction and his sentence. We affirm.
According to the written findings entered by Superior Court Judge Charles K. Cran-ston, Haggren was fishing with a drift net approximately 250 feet offshore from a shore fishery lease issued by the City of Kenai to Frank Canady. As Haggren was fishing, Canady placed a set net in the water and began to fish. Believing that the two nets were so…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ostrosky v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
- Clucas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
3Cited by12 opinions
- Allen v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002
- State v. DeCastroHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997
- Maguire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.