Legal Opinion

McKee v. Le Fors

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 1923No. 7043PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLY, O. J.

Defendant in error sued to recover in the county court on a promissory note for $1,200, executed by plaintiff in error, the same being reduced by payments to $938.30, and also sought to foreclose a mortgage lien on certain personal property given •to secure the debt. Judgment by default was taken for the debt and a foreclosure of the lien.. The petition fails to give the value of the mortgaged property.

The pleadings failed to show that the county court had jurisdiction, on account of a failure to allege the value of the property. It has been held, in a number of instances, that in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cotulla v. Thomas Goggan & Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Ware v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Childress Oil Co. v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Marshall v. G. A. Stowers Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Walker Mercantile Co. v. J. R. Raney Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. GivinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Jaco v. W. A. Nash Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Leifeste v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Southwestern Drug Corp. v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. R. O. Kipp Co. v. AnglinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API