Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bourdeau

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1922No. 4,821PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

In 1907 Leonel Bourdeau, a retail liquor dealer in Campbell, Nebraska, made application to the United States Fidelity *63& Guaranty Company (herein called the Company) for a bond required by the laws of Nebraska, and in his application agreed that, if the bond was furnished, he would indemnify and save harmless the Company against any loss which it might sustain by reason of having furnished the bond. The application was approved, the bond furnished, and Bourdeau received a license to conduct his business. In 1908 August Henkel sustained serious personal injuries while intoxicated, and on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harris v. RootMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Henry & Coatsworth Co. v. HalterNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. German-American Insurance v. BuckstaffNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Stoll v. SheldonNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  5. First National Bank v. BullardMontana Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bk. of Spokane v. MyhreMontana Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Rieckhoff v. WoodhullMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Schalk v. BreshnahanMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Schalk v. BreshnahanMontana Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API