Legal Opinion

German-American Insurance v. Buckstaff

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1893No. 4146PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from tbe district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Chapman, J. Tbe opinion contains a statement of facts. There was no competent proof of submission to arbitrators. Evidence of the oral agreement entered into by counsel was incompetent. (Sec. 7, ch. 7, Comp.

Read the full summary

Error from tbe district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Chapman, J. Tbe opinion contains a statement of facts. There was no competent proof of submission to arbitrators. Evidence of the oral agreement entered into by counsel was incompetent. (Sec. 7, ch. 7, Comp. Stats., 1889.) cited Burnham v. Smith, 11 Wis., 270. Where parties have submitted matters of difference to arbitrators of their own selection, and an award has been made in pursuance of such submission, the award will be deemed binding until set aside. (Tynan v. Tate, 3 Neb., 388.)

1Opinion of the CourtNor Val, J.

The defendant in error on and prior to the 21st day of October, 1887, was the owner of the Metropolitan Hotel building, situated on lots 16, 17, and 18, in blook 45, in the city of Lincoln, upon which there were in force policies of insurance against loss by fire in the following named companies and amounts: The German-American Insurance Company, $1,500; The Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Company, $3,000, and the Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, $1,500. On the night of October 21st a fire occurred, and the building covered by the policies was partially destroyed. Proofs of loss were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rich v. State National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Haylen v. Missouri Pac. R.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SayersNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. BachelorNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  3. McFarland v. Railway Officials & Employees Accident Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. BuckstaffNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. BuckstaffNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API