Legal Opinion

Rambo v. Rambo

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1948No. Civ. 3549PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial made under section 953e of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The action is one for a divorce on the grounds of extreme cruelty, for a division of community property, and for an allowance for support and maintenance. The court found in favor of the plaintiff, allowed her $3,000 from the community property, and ordered the defendant to pay her $60 per month until such payments amount to the sum of $3,000.

An interlocutory decree was entered on June 6, 1946. The defendant’s motion for a new trial was denied on July 29, 1946. A notice of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fickett v. RauchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Weisbecker v. WeisbeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Charles E. Hart v. Frank Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison, State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  2. Santa Cruz County Redevelopment Agency v. IzantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Battle v. MankoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Tomlin v. Reynolds Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  5. Charles E. Hart v. Frank Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison, State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API