State ex rel. Roy v. Industrial Commission

Claimant alleges two main defects in the commission’s order: (1) a failure to consider all allowed conditions; and (2) an insufficient explanation *263under Noll, which claimant argues warrants a writ to compel permanent total disability compensation pursuant to State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. Because we agree with claimant’s initial contention, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

The commission did not include claimant’s psychiatric condition in its deliberations. The court of appeals, however, held that State ex. rel. Cordray v. Indus. Comm.…