Legal Opinion
Sony Electronics, Inc. v. Soundview Technologies, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 4, 2005No. 3:00 CV 754(JBA)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruling on Soundview’s Motion to Dismiss All Pending Counterclaims of the Non-Soundview Parties [Doc. #476]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Soundview moves to dismiss the pending counterclaims of the non-Soundview par ties for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons that follow, Sound-view’s motion [Doc. # 476] is GRANTED.
I. Background
On September 25, 2002, this Court granted the Non-Soundview Parties’ 1 Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement, see Sony Elec. Inc. v. Soundview Technologies, Inc., 225 F.Supp.2d 164 (D.Conn.2002), and thereafter, with agreement of the parties,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Multiform Desiccants, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Medzam, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Buildex Incorporated v. Kason Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Ron Nystrom v. Trex Company, Inc. And Trex Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Rambus, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Exergen Corp. v. Brooklands Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Dragon Intellectual Property LLC v. DISH Network LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- Exergen Corporation v. Brooklands Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
- Exergen Corporation v. Brooklands Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018