Vinick v. Fourth National Bank of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice.
This is an application for certiorari for the review of a judgment of the Court of Appeals, Div. No. 1, which reversed the trial court’s judgment for defendant rendered on motion for summary judgment.
In the trial court, plaintiff (appellant) Reva Vinick, filed an action against the defendant (appellee) The Fourth National Bank of Tulsa, seeking her discharge from liability on a certain promissory note held by the bank, which was the original payee. She also sought the return of the collateral security she had deposited for the payment of the note, i.e., her…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Diehl v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Marcus v. FabrikantNew York Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beneficial Finance Co. of Norman v. MarshallCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- Madill Bank and Trust Co. v. HerrmannCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
- Warren v. Washington Trust BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- McDonald v. National Bank of Stigler (In Re Hill)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1980
- Wilmot v. Central Oklahoma Gravel Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980