Legal Opinion

Condit v. Bigalow

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 3, 1903PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Heard on bill, answer, replication and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Emeky, Y. C.

The object of this bill is to establish a resulting trust in lands which were conveyed in fee to William C. H. Waddell, under whom defendants claim title. The complainants claim under the wife of Waddell, and allege that the conveyance to Waddell was made for the purpose of a partition or division between the ■devisees of one Lemuel Cobb, the father of Mrs..Waddell,, of *506some of the lands devised by him to Mrs. Waddell and others, and that the husband, on taking the conveyance of these lands in his name, must be held to have taken the conveyance as trustee for his wife. The legal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van Renesselaer v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. RutzlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
  3. Lutjen v. LutjenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
  4. Weeks v. HaasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
  5. Staffordville Gravel Co. v. NewellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mendenhall v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Beaver v. RossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Denny v. Wilson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Battle v. ClaiborneTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Lewis v. KingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API