Legal Opinion

State v. Vennell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 30, 2015No. 120120FE; A151670PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

Defendant, who was convicted of possession of methamphetamine, assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Defendant was a passenger in a car during a traffic stop. During the course of the stop, the police directed the driver and all passengers, including defendant, to get out of the car. One of the officers asked for and received defendant’s consent to search his pockets, which contained methamphetamine paraphernalia and marijuana. In the trial court, the state did not dispute that the police had seized defendant at the time that the officer asked defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. UngerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. WatsonOregon Supreme Court · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. VannoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. State v. LowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. RondeauCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. VannoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API