Legal Opinion
Arthur Imerman Undergarment Corp. v. LOCAL 162, ETC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 11, 1956No. Civ. A. 699-56PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTSHORNE, District Judge.
This motion to confirm an arbitration award raises the threshold question as to the power of this particular Court to confirm this award, and thereafter, if such power exists, questions as to the extent of the confirmation, both as to the parties against whom the confirmation is to be entered as a judgment, and the nature of that judgment.
The two plaintiff New Jersey corporations, together with a third South Carolina corporation, called Spartan Undies, Inc., are all under the same control and identic stock ownership, and will hereafter be designated as Imerman. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States Ex Rel. Texas Portland Cement Co. v. McCordSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Local 205, United Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers of America (Ue) v. General Electric Company (Telechron Department, Ashland, Massachusetts)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- Murray Oil Products Co. v. Mitsui & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Enserch International Exploration, Inc. v. Attock Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1987
- Paul Allison, Inc. v. Minikin Storage of Omaha, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1978
- In Re Vms Securities Litigation.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Concourse Beauty School, Inc. v. PolakovDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- NII Metals Services, Inc. v. ICM Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.