Legal Opinion

Bayard v. . Singleton

Superior Court of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1787PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant pleaded not guilty, under the common rule.

He held under a title derived from the State, by a deed from a Superintendent Commissioner of confiscated estates.

At May Term, 1786, Nash for the defendant, moved that the suit be dismissed, according to an act of the last session, entitled an act to secure and quiet in their possession all such persons, their heirs and assigns, who have purchased or may hereafter purchase lands and tenements, goods and chattels, which have been sold or may hereafter be sold by commissioners of forfeited estates, legally appointed for that purpose, 1785,…

2Cited by40 opinions

  1. Leandro v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Stephenson v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Hart v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
  4. State ex rel. McCrory v. BergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  5. Moore v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 2023

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API