Bartron v. Codington County

(dissenting in No. 8410). The result reached in the majority opinion ought to be modified so as to include the affirmance of No. 8410.

I do not believe that the defendants acted in good faith. To me it seems that the evidence sustains the finding by the court which was as follows: “Doctor H. J. Bartron was made solely for and on behalf of the corporation, and with intent that the same was to be performed by the corporation”, especially in view of the fact that the majority deci sion expressly holds “that the bargains between the Bartron Clinic and Codington County are against public policy.”…