Legal Opinion

United States v. D'Aquila

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 10, 1989No. Crim. H-89-14(AHN)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS

NEVAS, District Judge.

The instant indictment charges some or all of the thirteen defendants with operation of an illegal gambling business, 18 U.S.C. Section 1955, conspiracy to collect debts by extortionate means and the related substantive offense, 18 U.S.C. Section 894. Defendants have moved to suppress the evidence obtained by the government as a result of electronic surveillance authorized by state wiretap panels. Three defendants, Vincent Sapere, Charles Cerreta and John Wiernasz, have also moved to suppress tangible evidence seized from their…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. RiosDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
  2. United States v. TracyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API