Legal Opinion
United States v. Tracy
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 5, 1991No. Crim. No. 5:91CR00006 (TFGD)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
DALY, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
On January 4, 1991, a federal grand jury sitting in New Haven, Connecticut returned a twelve-count indictment against nine individuals.1 Michael Tracy (“defendant”) was charged in count one of that indictment with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and to distribute cocaine. 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). Several attempts were made without success to execute the subsequently issued warrant for defendant’s arrest. Efforts to locate defendant led to the application for and execution of a federal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. CastellanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ex Parte TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Ex Parte TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995