Legal Opinion

Smith v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 2002No. 41A01-0109-CV-353PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Natalie Deem filed a complaint for damages against Courtney Smith, who was driving Deem's car in which Deem was a passenger when both parties were involved in a single-car accident. Smith, in turn, filed a declaratory judgment action against Deem's insurer, Cincinnati Insurance Company ("Cincinnati Insurance"), seeking a determination whether Smith was covered under Deem's insurance policy. After a bench trial, the court concluded that Smith was not entitled to liability coverage under the policy. Smith appeals from that judgment.

We affirm.

FACTS AND…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hurst v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Grandview Lot Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. HarmonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Lake States Insurance Co. v. Tech Tools, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Omaha Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. PetersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mikelson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Smith v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Mroz v. Indiana Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API