Legal Opinion

Larchmont Farms, Inc. v. Parra

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1997No. 96-0202PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case we consider whether the court of appeals erred in refusing, on public policy grounds, to enforce a New Jersey law that is substantially similar to our own exclusive remedy provision. 932 S.W.2d 68. We conclude that the court of appeals had no valid public policy basis to refuse to enforce the New Jersey provision under this state’s choice of law principles. We further disagree with the court of appeals’ conclusion that the employer did not trigger the provisions of the New Jersey law by its delay in filing an occupational injury report with the New Jersey Workers’ Compensation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gutierrez v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State of California, Department of Mental Hygiene v. CopusTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Herrick v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  4. Castilleja v. CameroTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Parra v. Larchmont Farms, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hughes Wood Products, Inc. v. WagnerTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Patterson v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. Thomas Spinozzi and Linda Spinozzi v. Itt Sheraton CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. ArteagaSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  5. Southwest Livestock and Trucking Company, Inc. Darrel Hargrove Mary Jane Hargrove v. Reginaldo RamnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API