Legal Opinion

Big Four Cold Storage v. Shanks

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 15, 1966No. 41438PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

This is an original action by Big Four Cold Storage and its insurance carrier, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, to review an order of the State Industrial Court awarding the claimant, Oscar Shanks, temporary total disability and medical treatment.

The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial tribunal.

The facts showed that the claimant was employed by the respondent to work in the freezer and cold storage plant where the temperature was approximately zero degrees. His work entailed lifting, carrying and stacking packaged meat. He would work…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Acme Flour Mills v. BraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Garr-Wooley Oil Company v. YearginSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc. v. RhoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Refrigerated Transport Inc. v. CreekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. YARBRO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. GriffithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  3. Cassidy v. NoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  4. City of Tulsa v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Parrott v. PattonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API