Wright v. DeArmond
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
The City of Danville, Illinois, and its Commissioners were named defendants in a voting rights suit brought by a group of minority Danville citizens. In the process of settling this suit, the Commissioners secured personal benefits. The Commissioners and the Danville Corporation Counsel were later convicted of conspiracy to violate state and local conflict-of-interest laws. The convictions were reversed by the Illinois Appellate Court but reinstated by the Illinois Supreme Court. The Commissioners and Corporation Counsel then sought a writ of habeas corpus in the federal…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wright v. City of DanvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- South Middlesex Opportunity Council, Inc. v. Town of FraminghamDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Hancock v. ThalackerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
- Claussen v. PenceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Ryan, LLC v. LewDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.